When someone controls more than half the computing power on a blockchain network, they can pull off a 51% attack, a scenario where a single entity or group dominates the network’s mining or validation power, allowing them to manipulate transactions and block history. Also known as a majority attack, it’s the biggest theoretical threat to any proof-of-work cryptocurrency. This isn’t science fiction—it’s a real risk for smaller blockchains that don’t have enough miners or stakers to make such control too expensive.
Here’s how it works: blockchains rely on consensus mechanism, the system that lets distributed nodes agree on the state of the ledger without a central authority. In Bitcoin and similar networks, miners compete to solve math problems and add new blocks. If one group controls over 51% of that mining power, they can outpace everyone else, reverse their own transactions, and prevent new ones from confirming. That’s called double spending, the act of spending the same digital currency twice by exploiting a network’s temporary lack of consensus. It doesn’t mean they can steal coins from other people’s wallets—but they can trick exchanges, merchants, or users into accepting fake payments that later vanish.
Big networks like Bitcoin and Ethereum are practically immune to this. The cost of buying or renting enough mining hardware to hit 51% would run into billions—and even then, the community could respond by changing the rules. But smaller coins—especially those with low hash rates or weak mining pools—are vulnerable. There have been real 51% attacks on Ethereum Classic, Verge, and Bitcoin Gold, where attackers stole millions in crypto. These aren’t just hacks—they’re failures of economic design.
So why does this matter to you? If you’re holding or trading smaller cryptocurrencies, you need to know if the network is secure. If you’re running a business that accepts crypto payments, you can’t assume every blockchain is as safe as Bitcoin. A 51% attack can wipe out trust overnight. And while most major platforms won’t accept coins with a history of these attacks, some still do—putting users at risk.
There’s no magic fix. The best defense is decentralization—more miners, more participants, more geographic diversity. Some chains are switching to proof-of-stake to avoid this problem entirely. Others use checkpointing or merged mining to add extra layers of security. But none of that matters if the network’s economic incentives are broken.
Below, you’ll find real-world breakdowns of how these attacks happen, which coins are most at risk, and what steps businesses and users can take to protect themselves. No theory. No fluff. Just what you need to know to spot danger before it hits.
A 51% attack lets a single entity control a blockchain’s mining power to reverse transactions and double-spend coins. Learn how it works, which networks are at risk, and why Bitcoin remains secure.